Oracle, Snowflake, and Datadog: Three Cloud Giants, Three Very Different Stories
Oracle, Snowflake, and Datadog all operate in cloud data infrastructure, but differ sharply in maturity, valuation, and risk.
In this finance-focused discussion, we examine three companies that often appear together in conversations about cloud computing and data—but operate in meaningfully different segments of the market: Oracle, Snowflake, and Datadog.
While all three live under the broad umbrella of cloud and data infrastructure, their business models, growth profiles, and market narratives differ substantially. Understanding those differences is critical—especially in a market that rewards clarity but punishes hype.
Podcast
Cloud Infrastructure: Hype, Scale, and Execution — on Apple and Spotify.
Datadog: Observability With Volatility
Datadog operates in the monitoring and observability space, helping engineering teams debug complex systems in real time. It’s widely used by enterprises building modern, distributed software and competes with companies like Dynatrace, New Relic, and native cloud tools such as AWS CloudWatch.
From a product perspective, Datadog is best-in-class. It requires early integration into the development lifecycle and becomes deeply embedded once adopted.
From a market perspective, however, the story is more complicated.
The stock has experienced significant volatility:
Sharp rallies following index inclusion
Steep pullbacks over short timeframes
A valuation that still prices in meaningful growth
This makes Datadog attractive to traders and long-term believers—but not without risk. It’s a reminder that great products don’t always translate into stable stock performance.
Snowflake: Data Infrastructure for the AI Era
Snowflake sits at the center of modern data strategy. Originally positioned as a cloud data warehouse, it has evolved into a broader data platform supporting structured and unstructured data—making it particularly relevant for AI and machine learning workloads.
Its customer list spans Fortune 500 companies across industries, and its main competitor today is Databricks, along with hyperscaler offerings like Amazon Redshift and Google BigQuery.
Snowflake’s challenge isn’t product quality—it’s valuation.
Despite strong adoption and relevance in the AI ecosystem:
The stock trades at a very high forward multiple
Long-term shareholders have seen uneven returns
Expectations are already priced aggressively into the stock
Snowflake exemplifies a classic high-growth dilemma: even great companies can be poor investments at the wrong price.
Oracle: A Legacy Giant With a New Narrative
Oracle is the most established company in this comparison—and historically, the least exciting.
That perception has changed.
In recent months, Oracle has re-entered the spotlight due to:
Rapid growth in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)
Strategic positioning as an alternative cloud provider
High-profile collaboration with OpenAI
Massive reported Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO)
These long-term contractual commitments suggest future revenue—but not guaranteed cash flow. Markets initially reacted with enthusiasm, driving the stock sharply higher, only to correct just as dramatically.
Oracle’s case highlights an important distinction: backlog is not revenue, and narrative is not execution. Still, relative to the others, Oracle trades at a far more conservative valuation—making it appealing to investors who believe in its cloud transformation.
Comparing the Three
Datadog
Core Strength: Observability & developer tooling
Market Perception: High-quality, volatile
Risk Profile: High
Snowflake
Core Strength: Data & AI infrastructure
Market Perception: Premium growth play
Risk Profile: High
Oracle
Core Strength: Enterprise + cloud scale
Market Perception: Re-emerging incumbent
Risk Profile: Moderate
Each company appeals to a different type of investor and user:
Datadog rewards operational excellence but demands tolerance for swings
Snowflake benefits from AI tailwinds but carries valuation risk
Oracle offers scale, backlog, and optionality—with less hype but more stability
Final Thoughts: Information, Not Advice
This comparison isn’t about recommendations—it’s about understanding how different cloud businesses behave in the market.
Metrics like forward P/E, short interest, and price history offer signals—but none tell the full story. The real takeaway is this:
valuation, narrative, and execution must align for long-term success.
Use analysis as input, not instruction. Question every thesis—including this one.