Enterprise AI Adoption Is Here—but the Real Divide Is How Teams Use It (feat. Sreedhar Peddineni)
Enterprise AI adoption isn’t limited by access to tools, but by how teams integrate them. Leaders who experiment, build workflows, and embed AI into operations gain real leverage; others remain stuck.
Over the last two years, AI has moved from novelty to inevitability. Every enterprise claims to be “AI-first,” every roadmap mentions generative models, and every employee says they “use AI daily.” Yet when you look closely, adoption tells a more uneven story.
In this conversation, we speak with Sreedhar Peddineni, founder and CEO of GTM Buddy, a company focused on revenue enablement and activation for modern go-to-market teams.
The real divide is no longer who has access to AI, but who knows how to turn it into leverage. This gap—between superficial usage and deep operational transformation—is shaping the next phase of enterprise software, go-to-market execution, and workforce skills.
Sreedhar brings deep experience building and scaling B2B technology companies and offers a grounded, operator’s perspective on enterprise AI adoption. The discussion explores where AI is truly creating leverage inside organizations, why access to AI tools is no longer a competitive advantage, and how leaders, engineers, and GTM teams must rethink workflows, skills, and execution to stay ahead.
Rather than focusing on hype, the conversation dives into practical realities—what’s actually working inside enterprises today, where adoption is stalling, and what separates teams experimenting with AI from those transforming with it.
Podcast
Surface-Level AI vs. Real Enterprise Transformation — on Apple and Spotify.
The Illusion of Ubiquitous AI Adoption
Ask anyone in a technology organization whether they use AI and the answer is almost always yes. Dig one level deeper and the dominant use cases emerge quickly:
Replacing traditional web search with conversational queries
Summarizing documents and meeting transcripts
Drafting emails, follow-ups, and lightweight content
Generating first-pass marketing or sales copy
These workflows are useful, but they are table stakes. They represent efficiency gains at the edges, not structural change. For many teams, AI has become a faster Google—not a new operating model.
This creates a false sense of progress. Organizations feel modern without fundamentally changing how decisions are made, how work flows across teams, or how value is delivered to customers.
The AI “Haves” and “Have-Nots”
Across mid-market and enterprise organizations, a clear pattern is emerging:
AI have-nots stop at generic tools and one-off prompts
AI haves build systems, workflows, and internal capabilities around AI
The latter group doesn’t just use models—they integrate them. They connect large language models to internal knowledge bases, CRM systems, call transcripts, enablement content, and domain-specific workflows. AI becomes part of how the organization thinks, not just how it writes.
These teams are experimenting with:
Role-specific agents trained on internal context
AI-assisted simulations and practice environments
Workflow automation across sales, product, and customer success
Continuous feedback loops where AI learns from outcomes
The result isn’t just speed—it’s better judgment at scale.
Why Enterprise-Wide Transformation Is Still Slow
If AI is so powerful, why hasn’t enterprise transformation fully arrived?
The answer lies in how change actually happens inside organizations.
Bottom-up innovation is happening everywhere. Every company has a handful of tinkerers experimenting with new models, tools, and workflows. But experimentation alone doesn’t scale. Without leadership commitment, these efforts remain isolated.
Top-down mandates are equally insufficient. Declaring “we are an AI-first company” without hands-on leadership involvement often results in symbolic adoption rather than real change.
The organizations making progress combine both:
Leaders who personally build, test, and ship with AI tools
Teams given freedom, budget, and psychological safety to experiment
Shared playbooks that translate experimentation into repeatable practice
Transformation accelerates when leaders stop consuming AI insights second-hand and start experiencing capability shifts directly.
AI Adoption Is a Skills Problem, Not a Tools Problem
Every employee today has access to world-class models. The differentiator is how well they collaborate with them.
This collaboration requires new skills:
Framing problems precisely
Iterating on outputs rather than accepting first drafts
Encoding personal or organizational style into reusable instructions
Knowing when not to rely on AI
There’s understandable anxiety that AI erodes foundational skills—writing, coding, reasoning. But skills don’t disappear; they change shape.
Just as calculators didn’t eliminate mathematical thinking, AI doesn’t eliminate creativity or technical depth. It shifts where judgment and originality are applied. The most effective practitioners are those who understand fundamentals deeply enough to guide AI rather than defer to it blindly.
What This Means for Technical Teams and GTM Functions
For go-to-market teams especially, the implications are profound. Selling complex products has always required context, timing, and credibility. AI now makes it possible to deliver the right knowledge to the right person at the right moment—if organizations architect for it.
This is where revenue enablement evolves into revenue activation: not just training and content, but live, contextual intelligence embedded directly into workflows. Sales reps, customer success managers, and partners are no longer left to search for information—they’re equipped dynamically, based on who they’re selling to and what matters in that moment.
The technical challenge isn’t model performance. It’s system design: integrating learning, content, and real-world signals into a coherent experience that drives outcomes.
The Road Ahead
Enterprise AI adoption has reached near-universal access, but practical differentiation now depends on how deeply models are integrated into real workflows. Most teams remain stuck at surface-level usage—search replacement, summarization, and copy generation—while a smaller subset embeds AI into systems of record such as CRM, enablement platforms, and internal knowledge graphs. These teams treat AI as infrastructure rather than a utility, designing feedback loops where model outputs are evaluated against outcomes (conversion rates, deal velocity, onboarding time) and continuously refined. The technical challenge is no longer model capability, but orchestration: connecting context, data freshness, permissions, and human judgment into repeatable, production-grade workflows.
AI adoption is irreversible. The open question isn’t whether roles will change—but how quickly individuals and organizations adapt.
Over the next few years:
Teams that treat AI as a side tool will fall behind
Roles will compress, but impact per individual will increase
Experimentation will become a baseline expectation, not a differentiator
The safest position is not skepticism or blind optimism—it’s active participation. Build with the tools. Break things. Learn where AI helps and where it doesn’t. The gap between AI haves and have-nots is widening, and it’s being defined by action, not access.